Make sense of super benefits

Following my recent comparison of the defence force's old and new super funds, several readers have provided feedback that the article didn't detail all the ways in which the old fund provided better benefits.
 
To backtrack a little, the government recently stopped entry to its existing MilitarySuper (known to most as MSBS) fund. From July 1, new personnel are instead offered membership of the new ADF super fund, or can opt to have their employer contribute to a super fund of their choice.
 
But for new defence employees unable to join, there's little point in highlighting what additional benefits MSBS members get in return for their minimum 5 per cent employee contribution. Indeed, the defence force generally is fortunate in that new entry to the MSBS was not stopped until now.
 
The large prospective reduction in the unfunded super liability resulting from ending new entry to the MSBS highlights the benefits for existing defined benefit fund members from not voluntarily switching to the newer fund.
 
For a number of reasons, employers including the Commonwealth government itself have been narrowing the scope and generosity of their super schemes. In previous years many employees could be confident even without studying the fine print that their super included comprehensive death and disability insurance and offered benefits related to their final salaries rather than investment returns.
 
The trend now is to place the responsibility for choosing insurance coverage and managing investment risks on fund members.
 
New Commonwealth and defence employees still receive employer contributions negotiated at the time of closure of entry to the defined benefit funds significantly higher than the minimum compulsory employer contributions. Despite this, as in the private sector new employees are required to make decisions about their insurance coverage and ensure the chosen investment risk profiles are appropriate for their personal or family situations.
 
Unlike defined benefit fund members where the key decisions are about ensuring member contributions maximise the employer contributions, the ultimate payouts to accumulation fund members depend upon decisions they make about investment options and insurance protection.
 
Unfortunately, especially at younger ages, the fact that superannuation benefits other than death and disability payouts are untouchable until at least age 60 results in important decisions often being left to the fund trustees via the default options offered by all funds.
 
Relying on default options can and often does result in inadequate insurance coverage to protect against possible contingencies, even though purchasing insurance protection in superannuation is the most tax effective way of covering these risks.

Next articles

Daryl Dixon

Executive Chairman

Daryl Dixon is one of Australia’s foremost investment experts and a well known writer and consultant. He has provided trusted advice to thousands of personal clients over more than 25 years and is an acknowledged expert in the areas of tax, superannuation (including public sector superannuation), social security and investments.

Read More