Retirees can’t rely on super

Last week a Grattan Institute paper argued that the federal government should cancel legislation to increase compulsory employer super contributions from 9.5 per cent to 12 per cent ‘‘as most Australians will be comfortable in retirement’’. If only that were the situation even for current retirees, funding our ageing population would not be the challenge it is now.

There are compelling reasons why limiting compulsory employer super contributions to 9.5 per cent warrants serious consideration, but not for the reason suggested by the Grattan Institute.

Together with state-levied payroll taxes and workers compensation insurance, large employers face additional on-costs of more than 15 per cent on top of the wages paid to employees. This encourages job outsourcing to lower-cost jurisdictions and capital equipment and artificial intelligence investments to reduce ongoing labour costs.

Compulsory super also encourages the self-employed to avoid the need to make any superannuation contributions. They can decide if and when to contribute to their super and can, if they wish, allocate all their savings to achieving home ownership. It’s no coincidence that since the introduction of compulsory superannuation, younger Australians are finding it more difficult to acquire a home.

The reluctance of governments to increase indirect taxation has also resulted in heavier personal income tax burdens, especially on overtime and other earnings required to get ahead. The self-employed still face the same taxation regime as employees, with the big advantage of being able to make a tax-deductible super contribution of up to $25,000 annually if it suits their situation.

The superannuation rules have become very unfriendly to people whose financial situation changes dramatically due to circumstances such as marriage breakdowns and job losses.

Calling a halt to further increases in compulsory employer contributions will increase the flexibility of workers to deal with the adverse impact of the further tax increases needed to fund the ageing population.

Future retirees need to realise, however, that their comfort will absolutely depend on how much they accumulate in working life via home ownership, superannuation or other assets. The Grattan Institute’s conclusion that all will be mainly fine for future retirees ignores the fact that even maintenance of current support will be a struggle for future governments.

Next articles

Daryl Dixon

Executive Chairman

Daryl Dixon is one of Australia’s foremost investment experts and a well known writer and consultant. He has provided trusted advice to thousands of personal clients over more than 25 years and is an acknowledged expert in the areas of tax, superannuation (including public sector superannuation), social security and investments.

Read More

Share